Islamic Hedging in the Perspective of Maqasid Shariah ‘Abd al-Majid al-Najjar


Total Views: 100

Authors

  • Ahmad Syaichoni UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Jl. Mayor Sujadi Timur No. 46 Plosokandang, Kedungwaru, Tulungagung, East Java 66221, Indonesia.
  • Amalia Nuril Hidayati UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Jl. Mayor Sujadi Timur No. 46 Plosokandang, Kedungwaru, Tulungagung, East Java 66221, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.573

Keywords:

Islamic Hedging, Maqasid Shariah, Islamic Financial Products, Risk Management, Islamic Financial Literacy

Abstract

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of Islamic hedging products in contributing to the Islamic financial industry in Indonesia, particularly in realising the Maqasid Shariah objectives according to ‘Abd al-Majid al-Najjar. Islamic hedging is generally perceived as an instrument designed to protect the business sector from risks, which aligns with Islamic derivatives’ primary objectives. However, the findings of this study reveal that Islamic hedging activities are unable to provide protection for social behaviour and maintain assets against the risks faced by business actors in the Indonesian financial sector. To ensure a fair analysis of these findings, several contributing factors should be further investigated. For instance, there may be a mismatch between the objectives of Islamic hedging and the broader Maqasid Shariah framework established by ‘Abd al-Majid al-Najjar, as the financial-driven nature of Islamic hedging may lack a focus on social aspects. Hence, this study contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the limitations of Islamic hedging in achieving Maqasid Shariah objectives within Indonesia’s Islamic financial sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, A. A., & Halim, M. A. A. (2014). The Concept of hedging in Islamic financial transactions. Asian Social Science, 10(8), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n8p42

Al Munawar, F. A. (2021). ‘Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār’s Perspective on Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah. Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, 20(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.4281

Alias, M. N., Al, M., Samuri, A., Mokhtar, A. I., Abdul, N., Nik, R., Ghani, A., Kamis, M. S., & Alias, N. (2021). A review of Maslahah Mursalah and Maqasid Shariah as methods of determining Islamic legal ruling. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 2994–3001. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350797327_A_Review_of_Maslahah_Mursalah_and_Maqasid_Shariah_as_Methods_of_Determining_Islamic_Legal_Ruling

Al-Najjar, ‘Abd al-Majid. (2008). Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah bi Ab’ād Jadīdah. Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī.

Al-Suwailem, S. I. (2009). Hedging in Islamic Finance. Islamic Research and Training Institute.

Antonio, M. S., Laela, S. F., & Jazil, T. (2020). Abu Zahrah’s Maqasid Shariah model as a performance measurement system. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(3), 519–541. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2020.11.3.30

Anwar, K., Ni’mati Rahmatika, A., & Amarudin, A. A. (2022). Praktik hedging di Bank Syariah mandiri perspektif fatwa DSN MUI No 96/IV/2015. Izdihar: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.32764/izdihar.v2i1.2554

Asosiasi Bank Syariah Indonesia. (2023). Laporan Tahunan Bank Syariah. https://www.asbisindo.or.id/data-dan-statistik/

Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-Shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Badan Pengelola Keuangan Haji. (2023). Laporan Keuangan Pengelolaan Dana Haji. https://bpkh.go.id/laporan-keuangan-bpkh/

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Islamic Finance Development Report. Bank Sentral Republik Indonesia. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/Default.aspx

Benedetti, G., & Campi, L. (2016). Utility Indifference Valuation for Non-smooth Payoffs with an Application to Power Derivatives. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 73(2), 349–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-015-9306-4

Christiani, T. A. (2016). Normative and empirical research methods: Their usefulness and relevance in the study of law as an object. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 219, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.006

Chusmita, L. A., & Tubagus Rifqy Thantawi (2016). Analisis penerapan hedging di perbankan Syariah Indonesia. Nisbah: Jurnal Perbankan Syariah, 2(2), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.30997/jn.v2i2.224

Fatturroyhan, F., & Djayusman, R. R. (2017). Islamic hedging, spekulasi atau manajemen risiko? (Analisis Kritik terhadap Islamic Hedging). Jihbiz: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 1(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.33379/jihbiz.v1i2.712

Fitriana, Y. (2019). Kesiapan penerapan hedging Syariah pada perbankan Indonesia. Al-Tijary Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 4(2), 95–108. https://journal.uinsi.ac.id/index.php/altijary/article/view/1464

Hasanah, S. M. (2022). hedging sebagai upaya memitigasi resiko dalam industri keuangan Islam. Fikroh: Jurnal Studi Islam, 6(1), 15–39. https://doi.org/10.37216/fikroh.v6i1.703

Hidayat, B., Ayu, N. R., Samsuri, A., & Nurjannah, E. (2022). The concept of hedging instrument forward in Islamic economic perspective. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.30736/jesa.v7i1.282

Indonesian Council of Ulama. (2015). Transaksi Lindung Nilai Syariah (Al-Tahawwuth Al-Islami/Islamic Hedging) Atas Niai Tukar (No. 96/DSN-MUI/IV/2015). National Shariah Board. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/peraturan/download_file/11eb35490e65dd4892b7313632323235/pdf/11eb35490e65db909147313632323235.html

Islamic Financial Services Board. (2023). Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2023. https://www.ifsb.org/publication/?_sft_publications_category=islamic-financial-stability-report

Khatib, S. (2018). Konsep Maqasid Al-Syari’ah: Perbandingan antara pemikiran Al-Ghazali dan Al-Syathibi. Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 5(1), 47–62. https://ejournal.uinfasbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/mizani/article/view/1436

Mohamad, A. D., Osman, K., & Mokhtar, A. I. (2020). Spirituality in Maqasid for the empowerment of human well-being. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11(10), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n10p6

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Statistik Perbankan Syariah Desember 2023. Departemen Pengelolaan Data dan Statistik. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Default.aspx

Pass, C. & L. D. (1994). Kamus Lengkap Ekonomi (T. Rumapea & P. Halolo, 2nd ed. & Trans.). Erlangga.

Patten, M. L. (2014). Proposing Empirical Research: a Guide to The Fundamentals. Pyrczak Pub.

Razif, N. F. M., Mohamad, S., & Rahman, N. N. A. (2012). Permissibility of hedging in Islamic finance. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(2), 155–159. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nor-Fahimah-Mohd-Razif-2/publication/296792232_Permissibility_of_hedging_in_Islamic_finance/links/59fc1aa2458515d070628409/Permissibility-of-hedging-in-Islamic-finance.pdf

Ridwan, M., & Santi, L. I. (2019). Revitalization Sunan Muria Waqf’s asset: Maqasid Shariah Al-Najjar’s approach. International Research Journal of Shariah, Muamalat and Islam, 1(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.35631/irjsmi.12007

Suherman, U. (2022). Mekanisme hedging Syariah di Indonesia dan pandangan para ulama fiqih. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(5), 5796–5804. https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/7084

Suryani, S., & Fathoni, M. A. (2017). Lindung nilai (hedging) perspektif Islam: Komparasi Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 11(2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.18326/infsl3.v11i2.351-372

Wijaya, A. (2014). Satu Islam ragam epistemologi: Dari epistemologi teosentrisme ke antroposentrisme. Pustaka Pelajar.

Zahrah, M. A. (1958). Uṣūl Fiqh. Dār al-Fikr.

Zuhaily, W. (1985). Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu. Dār al-Fikr.

Published

2024-12-01
CITATION
DOI: 10.33102/jmifr.573
Published: 2024-12-01

How to Cite

Ahmad Syaichoni, & Amalia Nuril Hidayati. (2024). Islamic Hedging in the Perspective of Maqasid Shariah ‘Abd al-Majid al-Najjar. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 21(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmifr.573

Issue

Section

Regular Issues